call before you buy - home
the dangers of binding mandatory arbitration (bma) clauses


home
the big problem
frequently asked questions
take action
press release
sponsors & links
help us?
forum
about us & contact
privacy policy


privatization gone wild

a times editorial
published april 6, 2005

---

lose a case, lobby the legislature to change the law. in yet another example of circumventing the judiciary, the check-cashing industry is trying to make arbitration agreements legally binding even when the underlying contracts are as illegal as usury. this bad legislation, sb 2242 and hb 1343, would overturn a recent 5-1 decision of the florida supreme court.

that threatens everybody, not just the relatively few floridians whose
illegal "payday" loans, predating present laws, are still being litigated.
too many routine contracts, for everything from stock brokerage accounts to consumer purchases, come with fine print waiving your right to see a judge over any disagreement. arbitration can be convenient and economical for both parties, but a real judge should have the first say when the underlying contract is fraudulent or offends public policy as gravely as some of the payday lending schemes did.

for the sake of the argument - which they lost - counsel for one of the
check-cashers had to concede to the court that even a contract for murder or illegal drugs would be controlled by an arbitration agreement. the arbitrator rather than a judge would decide whether it was illegal. that is privatization gone wild, and the legislature should have nothing to do with it.

---

back to breaking news

 

breaking bma news

 

 

 

 

 

 

arbitration in car contracts

 

top of page
the content for this site was developed and assembled by remar sutton & associates
© 2004 rsa
louis vuitton outlet