call before you buy - home
the dangers of binding mandatory arbitration (bma) clauses

the big problem
frequently asked questions
take action
press release
sponsors & links
help us?
about us & contact
privacy policy

privatization gone wild

a times editorial
published april 6, 2005


lose a case, lobby the legislature to change the law. in yet another example of circumventing the judiciary, the check-cashing industry is trying to make arbitration agreements legally binding even when the underlying contracts are as illegal as usury. this bad legislation, sb 2242 and hb 1343, would overturn a recent 5-1 decision of the florida supreme court.

that threatens everybody, not just the relatively few floridians whose
illegal "payday" loans, predating present laws, are still being litigated.
too many routine contracts, for everything from stock brokerage accounts to consumer purchases, come with fine print waiving your right to see a judge over any disagreement. arbitration can be convenient and economical for both parties, but a real judge should have the first say when the underlying contract is fraudulent or offends public policy as gravely as some of the payday lending schemes did.

for the sake of the argument - which they lost - counsel for one of the
check-cashers had to concede to the court that even a contract for murder or illegal drugs would be controlled by an arbitration agreement. the arbitrator rather than a judge would decide whether it was illegal. that is privatization gone wild, and the legislature should have nothing to do with it.


back to breaking news


breaking bma news







arbitration in car contracts


top of page
the content for this site was developed and assembled by remar sutton & associates
© 2004 rsa
louis vuitton outlet